Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-10-03 Thread Ulf Möller
James Livingston schrieb: Something I just thought of that would probably be worth talking about - how does the active contributor for voting, and other things, work if (unfortunately) the project forks? The forked project would be able to use the regular ODbL upgrade path (a later

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-10-02 Thread James Livingston
On 26/09/2009, at 3:02 AM, Mike Collinson wrote: - A very much re-worked Contributor Terms is now virtually complete and you can see a snapshot at http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_1kqzg8dhr . Something I just thought of that would probably be worth talking about - how does the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-10-01 Thread James Livingston
On 30/09/2009, at 1:00 AM, Matt Amos wrote: yes. but since there hasn't been any case law on what substantial means (at least in europe, yet) The reason I asked was because we had decision (Nine Network vs IceTV) from our High Court a few months ago, regarding the meaning of substantial

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-09-29 Thread Matt Amos
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote: On 28/09/2009, at 11:16 PM, Gustav Foseid wrote: Well... There is no copyright that expires after 15 years. Sui generis database rights expire after 15 years, but copyright is hardly very relevant for an OpenStreetMap

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-09-29 Thread Matt Amos
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, James Livingston wrote: On 28/09/2009, at 11:16 PM, Gustav Foseid wrote: Well... There is no copyright that expires after 15 years. Sui generis database rights expire after 15 years, but copyright is hardly very

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-09-28 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Mike Collinson m...@... writes: Here is a quick report from the License Working Group as we have been rather quiet.Since the proposal we made to the OSMF board in August and at SOTM 2009, we have been working on a number of small issues raised but now getting on track to make our final formal

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-09-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/9/28 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi: Mike Collinson m...@... writes: Article 10 Term of protection 1. The right provided for in Article 7 shall run from the date of completion of the making of the database. It shall expire fifteen years from the first of January of the year

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-09-28 Thread Gustav Foseid
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fiwrote: Will all contents of OSM year 2009 database be in public domain first of January, 2025? The database directive gives 15 years of protection for a dump of a database. As long as the database is updated, the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-09-28 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Lunes, 28 de Septiembre de 2009, Gustav Foseid escribió: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fiwrote: Will all contents of OSM year 2009 database be in public domain first of January, 2025? The database directive gives 15 years of protection for a

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New license status

2009-09-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/9/28 Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com: 2009/9/28 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es Better? :-) :-) does this mean yes? What is the situation with planned Odbl? cheers, Martin ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org