Andrew Turner wrote:
> It sounds like your primary concern is about interoperability. But
> isn't that perhaps just CC-implementation specific?
It is inherent to modules that seek to place different restrictions or
requirements on people.
> Perhaps something that can be addressed in ODbL with mod
It sounds like your primary concern is about interoperability. But
isn't that perhaps just CC-implementation specific?
Perhaps something that can be addressed in ODbL with modules? The
ability to have them merged together. Again, this would have *huge*
impact on the benefits to products and consum
Hi,
Andrew Turner wrote:
> I would like to know more about how they're not compatible?
Well you cannot use data from a CC-BY-NC project in a CC-BY-SA project.
(For example, there is a Karlsruhe local Wiki using CC-BY-NC from which
I would have liked to use data for OSM; and your "marketing"...
Andrew wrote: "Suggesting that someone can "just copy ... and strike
out the words
they don't like" is not actually an option. For one, this is a new
license that has to be verified, vetted - and no one else will know
what the implications are or ability to trust the license. And then we
get into t
I was hoping to have more feedback on this - especially from those
working directly on the license itself such as Steve, Nick, or other
OSMF board.
My responses inline:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Turner wrote:
>> One thing that has made Crea
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> In my eyes this modular nonsense is actually the greatest problem with
> the CC licenses and I'm happy not to see it repeated here.
A little harsh but I do agree that "licence proliferation" is a bad
thing. ODbL should not support it.
- Rob.
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
Andrew Turner wrote:
> One thing that has made Creative Commons incredibly successful is the
> modularity of the various components: Attribution, Share-Alike,
> Non-Commercial, etc.
Yes, I find it incredibly useful to effectively have 10 different
licenses that somehow all sound as if they a
Hi - I apologize for not being completely up to speed on the work and
direction of the ODbL. However based on some brief discussions with
various people involved it seems as though a particular issued isn't
being addressed.
The ODbL is seeking to clarify the meaning of putting an open license
on d
