On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:49:32AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:20:32PM +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> >> I cannot speak for everyone, but I do think that the general idea is to
> >> make
> >> the ODbL work like a copyleft license (i.e. you're required to distri
Hi,
Simon Ward wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:20:32PM +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
>> I cannot speak for everyone, but I do think that the general idea is to make
>> the ODbL work like a copyleft license (i.e. you're required to distribute
>> the "source" data only to the people you di
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:20:32PM +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> I cannot speak for everyone, but I do think that the general idea is to make
> the ODbL work like a copyleft license (i.e. you're required to distribute
> the "source" data only to the people you distribute the maps to). You'l
Ivan,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> Right now, the wording of the ODbL includes the word "public" a few more
> times
> than I think it's neccesary, so it works differently (i.e. I think it doesn't
> pass the DFSG "dissident test").
I agree - could you add something about that "dissident test" o
