Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Retain PD mapper's contributions?

2011-11-27 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 27 November 2011 14:10, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Mike N. wrote: Frederik Ramm wrote: there are some people whose edits we know we can keep somehow (even if someone has to manually copy them and upload under their own account) Is this a way that we might be able to

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Retain PD mapper's contributions?

2011-11-27 Thread Richard Fairhurst
andrzej zaborowski wrote: Honestly both solutions are kind of ugly because they mess up edits history. If some data is PD then it should be possible to just retain it in the event of a license change, the SQL query is unlikely to change its legal status. Surely you understand that the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Retain PD mapper's contributions?

2011-11-27 Thread andrzej zaborowski
On 27 November 2011 15:14, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: andrzej zaborowski wrote: Honestly both solutions are kind of ugly because they mess up edits history.  If some data is PD then it should be possible to just retain it in the event of a license change, the SQL query is

[OSM-legal-talk] Retain PD mapper's contributions?

2011-11-26 Thread Mike N
[From Talk..] On 11/26/2011 1:01 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: there are some people whose edits we know we can keep somehow (even if someone has to manually copy them and upload under their own account) Is this a way that we might be able to retain a declared-PD-but-CT-declining mapper's