[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:34:33 +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> El Viernes, 4 de Abril de 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> escribió:
>>> There is no „minimal size of data” for the CC-BY-SA to apply.
>>> Hence all
>>> „viral SA” elements are triggere
Hello,
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:34:33 +0200, Iván Sánchez Ortega
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Viernes, 4 de Abril de 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> escribió:
>> IANAL, but no matter how teeny-weeny the data is, someone is using,
>> still
>> the data comes licenced under CC-BY-SA.
>> There is no
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
> It means that CC isn't here to overcome local copyright law. So, if
> your local
> jurisdiction has a fair use right (e.g. US), you can apply it, no
> matter the
> CC license. The same applies for citation rights, private copy,
> parody, etc
> etc in other jurisd
El Viernes, 4 de Abril de 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> IANAL, but no matter how teeny-weeny the data is, someone is using, still
> the data comes licenced under CC-BY-SA.
> There is no „minimal size of data” for the CC-BY-SA to apply. Hence all
> „viral SA” elements are triggered.
Yes, th
Hello,
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:04:17 +0200, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [ Some company has ] a GPS track and
> want some road names for it.
>
> (1) I'm not sure whether the minuscle amount
> of data you would use from OSM is actually protected by copyright and
> would trigger the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frederik Ramm wrote:
| My answer was two-part: (1) I'm not sure whether the minuscle amount
| of data you would use from OSM is actually protected by copyright and
| would trigger the viral SA element of the license,
I think that's like looking up so
Frederik Ramm wrote:
>Sent: 03 April 2008 8:36 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Reverse Geocoding
>
>Hi,
>
>> > What's your opinion? And would it change should the proposed new
>> > license
>> > get ado
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>Sent: 03 April 2008 8:25 PM
>To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
>Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Reverse Geocoding
>
>Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> What's your opinion? And would it change should the proposed new
>> license
>>
Hi,
> > What's your opinion? And would it change should the proposed new
> > license
> > get adopted?
>
> a. It's a bit of a moot point, because CC-BY-SA doesn't force you to
> distribute; so if the company generates the invoice and sends it to
> their customers, who don't distribute it any
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> What's your opinion? And would it change should the proposed new
> license
> get adopted?
a. It's a bit of a moot point, because CC-BY-SA doesn't force you to
distribute; so if the company generates the invoice and sends it to
their customers, who don't distribute it
Hi,
I had an interesting question put to me and would like to hear your
opinion.
There's a company that does invoicing for certain types of road works,
like cutting grass along a road or cleaning a road. The vehicle used
by the workers has a GPS unit, and at the end of the day they have a
GPS
11 matches
Mail list logo
