On 19 December 2010 20:16, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Grant Slater
> wrote:
>>
>> Download the license from the OpenGeoData post, it is called ""Bing
>> Maps Imagery Editor API License FINAL.pdf"
>
> That's quite curious. Several non-Microsoft sources have in
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
> It may be true that tracing aerial images (what you probably wanted to
> state) does not create a derived work in -some- jurisdictions, but anything
> else I wouldn't be so sure of.
If you have nothing to add, why respond?
___
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Grant Slater
wrote:
> Download the license from the OpenGeoData post, it is called ""Bing
> Maps Imagery Editor API License FINAL.pdf"
>
That's quite curious. Several non-Microsoft sources have indicated that the
license will be subject to future revisions. And
On 19 December 2010 16:53, David Groom wrote:
>> Have you read? Microsoft mention a whole lot more than what link to
>> http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2010/12/01/bing-maps-aerial-imagery-in-openstreetmap.aspx
>> Try the google cache version: http://bit.ly/eUjkKS
>
> Ye
- Original Message -
From: "Grant Slater"
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions."
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone already had a look at the Bing
Termsof
Use?
On 19 December 2010 14:40, David Groom wrote:
Th
