On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Now the WMF has consistently supported that facts are not copyrightable,
Correct.
so there should not be any danger there
Note that WMF is not the copyright holder in Wikipedia's content, so you of
course have to take
Tom,
Licenses like CC and ODbL can only apply to copyrighted material, which
must generally be a specific creative expression in a fixed medium. You
can't copyright facts, nor opinions.
Assuming you don't have some crazy natural language processing workflow in
mind, you'll only be using the
