John Wilbanks wrote:
> This is why if you peruse the CC0 site, you'll see it referred to as a
> legal tool and not a license. It's a small thing, but an important thing
> to remember. Conflating the waiving of rights with the licensing of
> rights is what we're trying to avoid in this context.
> > (although I find the idea that freedom can only come from the
> > barrel of a license deeply depressing).
> That's CC Zero out of the running then.
Actually no. This is a slightly wonky lawyer debate about semantics, but
we think tools like CC0 should be called *waivers* and not *licenses
