On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Then you must have the same objection to tracing from Yahoo's imagery.
Unlike Bing, there is no specific agreement between Yahoo and OSM.
Yahoo only agreed that the act of tracing from the satellite imagery
that they
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I believe there'll be a Bing Maps blog post going up soon on the same
topic.
- Original Message
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thu, 2 December, 2010 19:02:55
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing license
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I believe there'll be a Bing Maps blog
.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-some-interesting-points-from-the-bing-license-tp5790772p5799222.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
the Scribd document then I've also uploaded it to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing#Licence .
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-some-interesting-points-from-the-bing-license-tp5790772p5799244.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Andrew Harvey wrote:
I am yet to see a license.
http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details has a set of terms of use
embedded in the post specifically for OSM. It's a Scribd document and
therefore requires
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Andrew Harvey wrote:
I am yet to see a license.
http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details has a set of terms of use
embedded
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I the only one that sees a problem with the legal foundation of
tracing from Bing imagery? Take a look at how NearMap.com make their
imagery available for tracing. On their website along with the their
license of
On 3-12-2010 17:23, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Then you must have the same objection to tracing from Yahoo's imagery.
Unlike Bing, there is no specific agreement between Yahoo and OSM.
Yahoo only agreed that the act of tracing from the satellite imagery
that they host and putting the traced
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Personally I'm delighted that Bing is happy to work with us, and I think
their attitude to permitting tracing without claiming a share in any
(allegedly) resulting IP reflects very well on them when compared to Google
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:34 AM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Whereabouts is the prior written consent from Microsoft which would enable
us to trace and thus create derivative works?
David
[1]
At the time of my writing Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:59 AM CET is when I
was working on that, there was no mention of this other license, at
least I did not see it.
Sorry for misleading,
mike
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:10
soon on the same topic.
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-some-interesting-points-from-the-bing-license-tp5790772p5795386.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 12/01/2010 02:31 PM, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Anthony o...@inbox.org Isn't
http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details the prior written
consent from Microsoft.
I'm not sure it is,
/OSM-legal-talk-some-interesting-points-from-the-bing-license-tp5790772p5797213.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Mike Dupont wrote:
I have highlighted and commented on points from the bing Tou for discussion
http://osmopenlayers.blogspot.com/2010/11/interesting-points-from-bing-bind.html
thanks,
mike
We have a ToU agreement specially designed for osm (Bing Maps Imagery
Service Editor Application API's
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
We have a ToU agreement specially designed for osm (Bing Maps Imagery
Service Editor Application API's Terms of Use [1]) so do we even need to
consider the general terms of use?
They are both somewhat similar,
expect every 'i'
to be dotted and 't' to be crossed quite yet, whether in terms of language
or hosting.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-some-interesting-points-from-the-bing-license-tp5790772p5791311.html
Sent from the Legal Talk
- Original Message -
From: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing license
Mike Dupont wrote:
I have highlighted and commented on points
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:34 AM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Whereabouts is the prior written consent from Microsoft which would enable
us to trace and thus create derivative works?
David
[1] http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details
Isn't
On 12/01/2010 02:31 PM, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
Isn't http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details the prior
written consent from Microsoft.
I'm not sure it is, or certainly if it is enough.
Anthony's weaponized literalism aside, that
Hello,
In addition, the LWG is going to have a look at the terms for the same
reason.
Emilie Laffray
On 1 December 2010 16:07, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 12/01/2010 02:31 PM, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
Isn't
-Original Message-
From: legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:legal-talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Rob Myers
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:08 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing
license
I have highlighted and commented on points from the bing Tou for discussion
http://osmopenlayers.blogspot.com/2010/11/interesting-points-from-bing-bind.html
thanks,
mike
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania
flossk.org flossal.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
