[OSM-legal-talk] Feedback requested ... OSM Poland data

2012-03-06 Thread Michael Collinson
I am trying to find a solution that will allow the UMP project in Poland to continue using OSM data and therefore reciprocally allow OSM to keep a large amount of data that went into making the initial road map of Poland and which is still there. The UMP project collects road routes within

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Feedback requested ... OSM Poland data

2012-03-06 Thread Ed Avis
Legally there's no downside for granting extra permissions. They are additive on top of whatever licence is used and don't damage anyone else's use of the data. However, it is not in the spirit of the community terms for OSMF to grant exemptions or extra permissions - particularly not if they

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Feedback requested ... OSM Poland data

2012-03-06 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 03/06/12 10:55, Michael Collinson wrote: The OSMF acknowledges the kind help of UMP project and its members in creating the OSM map of Poland. The OSMF acknowledges that the UMP project is similar in spirit; providing geodata that is free and open. Provided that UMP continues to publish

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Feedback requested ... OSM Poland data

2012-03-06 Thread Ed Avis
Is there a way to provide what UMP want by making a Produced Work (which could be public domain or CC) rather than a Derived Database? -- Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Feedback requested ... OSM Poland data

2012-03-06 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Michael Collinson wrote: - as an OSM community member, are you happy for the OSMF to make such a statement? - is it true? - can you see any negative consequences? I'm with Ed and Frederik on this one, I'm afraid - I don't see any way in which we can afford additional permissions on a one-off

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Post-Changeover Attribution

2012-03-06 Thread Rob Myers
On 06/03/12 18:07, Michael Collinson wrote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ/ODbL3a. I would like to use OpenStreetMap maps. How should I credit you? I recommend Map tiles copyright OpenStreetMap, licenced CC-BY-SA, as that works better with BY-SA's requirement of a copyright

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Post-Changeover Attribution

2012-03-06 Thread Mike Linksvayer
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote: On 06/03/12 18:07, Michael Collinson wrote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ/ODbL 3a. I would like to use OpenStreetMap maps. How should I credit you? I recommend Map tiles copyright OpenStreetMap, licenced

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Post-Changeover Attribution

2012-03-06 Thread Rob Myers
On 06/03/12 20:30, Mike Linksvayer wrote: I also recommend using the *word* copyright rather than (c), as it is my understanding that the English word has international legal weight but the copyright symbol or its ASCII equivalent doesn't. That's the oddest thing I've read today. Really?

[OSM-legal-talk] What happens on April 1?

2012-03-06 Thread Steve Bennett
Hi all, Could someone explain exactly what will be happening on April 1? Will we really be purging all data from decliners? And if so, is this not terrible timing, given the recent, high-profile signups of companies like foursquare? Given that many people are now actively remapping, is there