On 27 August 2013 12:04, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com wrote:
Amidst hard questions in the Brazilian community, I've been wondering
which copyright legislation should apply to OpenStreetMap's data (in
the case of suspicious data imports): that of where the data is stored
and
On 26.08.2013 00:14, Paul Norman wrote:
I worry:
OSM data can be used for any purpose, including commercial ones. The
license above explicitly forbids commercial gain: At no time should
this imagery or LIDP be used for other than USG-related purposes and
must not be used for commercial gain.
From: Stephan Knauss [mailto:o...@stephans-server.de]
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery license clarification needed
Not understanding what the definition of LIDP is makes it so difficult
for me to understand the license.
Martin replied earlier and he did interpret it as not suitable
Dear Friends,
We're preparing use of National Land Survey of Finland datasets with OSM.
What is process to update Copyright
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/en) and Contributors pages
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors).
Contributors page is writable with basic wiki
Hi All,
This has come up before. HOT is part of a pilot for the initiative
Imagery to the Crowd (1). Representatives of HOT and the US
Government met multiple times in all day meetings to discuss what the
NextView license means as well as to have the vectors available under
ODbL. The legal
From: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Which legislation applies: server or data
location?
Ian has already given a good answer. So just a couple of further notes:
Some more notes, from a slightly different
