Clause 3 in CTs says:
An active contributor is defined as:
a contributor natural person (whether using a single or multiple accounts)
This aims, I suppose, at giving only one vote for each natural person. How could
this be checked? The real identity of contributer has never been asked, all we
Rob Myers typed:
(IANAL, TINLA.)
Abbreviations causes me headaches: IANAL = I am not a lawyer and TINLA =
This is not legal advice
--
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
legal-talk mailing list
On 21 September 2010 06:38, Ulf Möller o...@ulfm.de wrote:
On the other hand, if someone has two accounts, we probably can rely on the
honor system.
Currently it's being suggested that people create a second account so
they can agree to the CTs, this doesn't seem to be the sort of thing
that
On 20 September 2010 23:26, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 September 2010 06:38, Ulf Möller o...@ulfm.de wrote:
On the other hand, if someone has two accounts, we probably can rely on the
honor system.
Currently it's being suggested that people create a second account so
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:10:59 -0400
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
CTs are per account. Active Contributors are per person.
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms_FAQ
a last minute explanatory add-on
initially CTs were per person
now the rules slide and change
On 21 September 2010 08:10, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
CTs are per account. Active Contributors are per person.
Exactly, you agree to the CTs as a person, which then encompasses all
accounts used, unless the wording of the current CTs is changed your
suggestion shouldn't be given.
