On 19 April 2011 01:27, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Where? The only reference I see to sublicense is You may not sublicense
the Work.
See my earlier remarks. 4(b) permits the distribution (amongst other things)
of a Derivative Work under a licence (which might not be a CC licence) other
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the
CT)
On 18/04/11 22:41, Simon Ward wrote:
The only restriction I have seen is that some software developers
perceive reciprocal licences as a hindrance because the reciprocal
licenses prevent them from removing
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
[some hard-to-follow stuff]
Gert - could you quote in the same way that everyone else does, please? i.e.
no top-posting, snip the bits of the message you're replying to, prefix each
line of quoting with , line-wrap your quotes properly. It
On 19/04/11 11:18, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Instead he original phrase sounds hostile to me... what about you ?
The rights need to be granted in that way so they can be passed on to users.
So, no, it doesn't sound hostile. It sounds like it makes the operation
of
