2011/6/17 Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com:
The goal of that statement was to allow any contributions that have been
derived from our PhotoMaps under our current licence (which is what imposes
the CC-BY-SA redistribution condition) can remain in the OSM db. Not being
a lawyer, I'm not going to
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
The goal of that statement was to allow any contributions that have been
derived from our PhotoMaps under our current licence (which is what imposes
the CC-BY-SA redistribution condition) can remain in the OSM db. Not being
Hi Dermot,
That's not a bad start - but if I play spot-the-missing-bit, it looks
to me that you aren't prepared to trust 2/3 of the community to decide
that (for reasons not yet forseen) a licence other than the two you
list and which may not be copyleft/sharealike.
Please note that the CT
Hi,
On 06/17/11 11:18, John Smith wrote:
Only if the amount of data traced is not substantial.
CC-by-SA makes no such distinction, it's either cc-by-sa or it's not
cc-by-sa, so which license can tiles be put under?
Sorry, I thought you had asked about tracing from tiles.
Tiles can be put
On 18 June 2011 00:06, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 06/17/11 11:18, John Smith wrote:
Only if the amount of data traced is not substantial.
CC-by-SA makes no such distinction, it's either cc-by-sa or it's not
cc-by-sa, so which license can tiles be put under?
Sorry, I
On 18 June 2011 00:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:44 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 June 2011 00:40, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I am not trying to apply patents to OSM. I am trying to use the example of
patents
Because you want to sell/offer s service in the EU, enter one of the
countries and numerous other reasons. As long as you don't make the
derived database available or publish the contents in some form -in- the
EU you are not in trouble, just if.
Simon
Am 17.06.2011 16:54, schrieb John
On 18 June 2011 01:10, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Because you want to sell/offer s service in the EU, enter one of the
countries and numerous other reasons. As long as you don't make the derived
database available or publish the contents in some form -in- the EU you are
not in trouble,
On 17 June 2011 16:48, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
On 06/17/11 16:39, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
1. IIRC the newer versions of CC-By-SA include statements to ensure
that the content is not protected by database rights, patents or DRM,
which would prevent their uses.
News to me.
On Friday, 17 June 2011, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer o...@amen-online.de wrote:
Please note that the CT do not guarantee a 2/3 majority of the community. Only
a part of the community is entitled to vote.
I read your other mail on that topic. I don't personally have any
objection to addressing
On 17 June 2011 17:17, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2011 16:48, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
On 06/17/11 16:39, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
1. IIRC the newer versions of CC-By-SA include statements to ensure
that the content is not protected by database
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:01 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 00:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:44 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 June 2011 00:40, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I am
2011/6/17 Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com:
On Friday, 17 June 2011, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer o...@amen-online.de wrote:
I read your other mail on that topic. I don't personally have any
objection to addressing weaknesses in the definition of active
contributor.
If we take the voting issues
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer schrieb:
The first problem is that the right to vote depends upon being allowed to
contribute.
It it defined anywhere what contribute means? I have heard statements
before that sending messages, e.g. in here, also counts as a
contribution, as does replying to a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer schrieb:
The first problem is that the right to vote depends upon being allowed to
contribute.
It it defined anywhere what contribute means?
From the contributor terms v1.2.4
An active
The CT/License Vote was IMHO not meant to be a serious democratic
process. Instead a majority was searched for a OSMF decision:
cynism on
like non anonymous voting for a single party in some countries
where your lose your job if voting against -fill in your favorite dictator-
cynism off
As long as
Word in quotes below relate to the meanings given them by ODbL
Assume I use jxapi to download an extract of the main OSM database . Is the
downloaded extract a Derivative Database, or since the download was
provided by OSM does the downloaded data qualify as simply a Database?
Regards
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:09 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Word in quotes below relate to the meanings given them by ODbL
Assume I use jxapi to download an extract of the main OSM database . Is the
downloaded extract a Derivative Database, or since the download was
provided
On 18 June 2011 05:25, davespod osmli...@dellams.fastmail.fm wrote:
In a similar vein, I think OSMF and any other publisher of OSM-derived map
tiles under CC-by-SA would be well advised to be explicit about what it is
they are licensing under CC-by-SA. In other words, they should follow the
19 matches
Mail list logo
