Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-04 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/2 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: Hi,   suppose there's a node that has been created by user A with no tags on it. Suppose the node has later been moved by user B. A has not accepted the CT, while B has. Will the node have to be removed when we go to phase 5 of the license

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-04 Thread John Smith
On 4 July 2011 22:44, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO the node position is never a derived work when it is updated. So for the case of the untagged node (if isolated an not part of a way, i.e. unlikely) we could keep the whole object. The position of nodes are often

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

2011-07-04 Thread Jaakko Helleranta.com
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:53 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: The position of nodes are often derived from the position of other nodes. Nothing of me is original. I am the combined effort of everyone I've ever known. (1) and hence the secret of Creativity is knowing how to hide