Re: [OSM-legal-talk] (c) statement on openstreetmap.org slippy map?

Paul - Are you talking about the link to "Copyright and License" under "Help" in the left-nav or the statement "The data is free to download and use under its open license

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] (c) statement on openstreetmap.org slippy map?

Hi! Maybe you are talking about different versions of the site? I just checked with my phone, and on the mobile version I can't find any copyright information, as the left menu column displayed in the desktop version is hidden on the mobile site. Kind regards, Marty 17 jan 2013 kl. 05:26 skre

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] (c) statement on openstreetmap.org slippy map?

Where is it? I didn't see any copyright on osm.org. On Wednesday, January 16, 2013, Paul Norman wrote: > There is a prominent copyright & license link on the openstreetmap.orgpage > outlining the copyright information in detail. > osm.org is a bit of a unique case because all the content on the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] (c) statement on openstreetmap.org slippy map?

There is a prominent copyright & license link on the openstreetmap.org page outlining the copyright information in detail. osm.org is a bit of a unique case because all the content on the site is openstreetmap data and the copyright information is content in its own right. From: Jeff Meyer [mai

[OSM-legal-talk] (c) statement on openstreetmap.org slippy map?

Hi legal types - Should we be marking our own map at openstreetmap.org with the same markings we ask others to use? My impression is that you're supposed to mark a copyright in any use of the copyrighted material - is that incorrect? This is the practice Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and MapQuest us

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Regarding The New OSM License

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Rob wrote: > Hello. > > Would like to ask / discuss with you the new license for OSM if you do not > mind. > > I have a website that I would like to integrate/include OSM map tiles into. > > What I would like to clarify is if I would be required to share the data

[OSM-legal-talk] Regarding The New OSM License

Hello. Would like to ask / discuss with you the new license for OSM if you do not mind. I have a website that I would like to integrate/include OSM map tiles into. What I would like to clarify is if I would be required to share the data which is / has been collected through the website. I woul

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] RFC - OSM contributor mark

> From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com] > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] RFC - OSM contributor mark > > My initial writeup could have been clearer: This RFC _does_ seek to > replace the currently recommended line "(c) OpenStreetMap contributors" > linking to http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright wit

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Combining NC Data with ODbL

Kate Chapman-2 wrote > 2. I have a spreadsheet of hospital locations licensed CC-BY-NC, I use > OSM to geocode these locations. I believe this can't happen because of > the incompatibility of the two licenses. Aren't the results of geocoding produced works and therefore can be licensed according t

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Combining NC Data with ODbL

> From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Combining NC Data with ODbL > > This is very sad, I'm sure almost all contributors to OSM would like to > not have these restrictions for certain scopes (like HOT). What if we > made a change to our license

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Combining NC Data with ODbL

On Jan 16, 2013, at 6:03 AM, Simon Poole wrote: > > Am 15.01.2013 18:02, schrieb Alex Barth: >> On Jan 14, 2013, at 5:30 AM, Simon Poole wrote: > > It would not be out of the question to add a specific "geo-coding" > licence or terms to the canon of licences that the OSMF is allowed to > dist

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Combining NC Data with ODbL

Alex, While I agree with the principal that the restrictions on geocoding are preventing groups from joining the OSM community, I don't think changing the insubstantial clause is the way to fix the issue. The clause is there for just that insubstantial use, to make it high enough to allow geocodin

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Combining NC Data with ODbL

Hi Martin, I appreciate the sentiment, though I think it have unintended consequences. The reason I am asking the questions I'm asking is as part of a greater effort to advocate within humanitarian groups to release their data under licenses compatible to OSM. Often the issue with data after a di

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Combining NC Data with ODbL

2013/1/15 Kate Chapman : > Hard to say if it would be substantial, I think that is going to > depend on the size of the disaster and what exactly the data is being > used. I think with the current guidelines any extraction will be very soon substantial, "The OSM community regards the following as

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Combining NC Data with ODbL

Am 15.01.2013 18:02, schrieb Alex Barth: > On Jan 14, 2013, at 5:30 AM, Simon Poole wrote: > >> Am 14.01.2013 08:36, schrieb Kate Chapman: >>> 2. I have a spreadsheet of hospital locations licensed CC-BY-NC, I use >>> OSM to geocode these locations. I believe this can't happen because of >>> the