On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Prado, Renato (R.P.) rpr...@visteon.com wrote:
Hello!
Are you planning to just overlay your data over the background map as
a separate and independent layer? If yes, then this would qualify as a
collective work under CC and you just need to attribute OSM in the
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Prado, Renato (R.P.) rpr...@visteon.com wrote:
Well, here is a little idea, you can just distribute your data as a
transparent png file or similar technique that can be overlayed over
any map and let the users put it on top of what they want.
During online
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:21:12 +0200,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just an observation :
These maps look just like if not identical to the russian topographical
maps. mike
Are russian topographical maps
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
actually I feel that you treated this issue a little negligent. The
import guidelines stated since 5 March 2008 (quote):
At the time of writing (spring 2008),
For me, I heard about
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:04 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/31 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
actually I feel that you treated this issue a little negligent. The
import guidelines stated since 5 March 2008 (quote):
At the
I second that.
Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com this is a fake account, just
causing problems.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
copyright are the chains of the modern worker, holding to
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Maybe we shouldn't abandon the relicensing effort, but start a new
relicensing effort, focussed on fixing the problems with CC-BY-SA
without adding on a dozen other special interest fixes like Produced
Works and Contributor Terms
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Duane,
I wonder how Frederik is going to rationalise having the Kosovo
information removed,
I haven't made a statement about the Kosovo information. I'm sure that
whoever has imported it has made sure it would be
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 August 2010 00:40, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike, my understanding (and I think Grant will agree) is that copyleft is an
idea: I publish something in such a way that coerce others into sharing
their work
my question is, why dont you just make a fork for the new license and
leave the rest of us to continue in peace? get the new system working
and then we can talk about it.
mike
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Eric Jarvies e...@csl.com.mx wrote:
As follows: if X uses your data under a contract with you that
requires use in a particular way (eg to mimic something like the GPL)
and X, in breach of that agreement, passes data to Y then barring
certain special
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
...why should the onus of forking be
on the license-change agreers? If this is indeed the case, then the ones who
should fork are those for CC-BY-SA 2.0.
because the license change is not going to work in the first
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:56 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 August 2010 10:28, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 08/27/2010 04:43 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
I would like to know if the new license is compatible with the old one.
will we be able to use
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Renaud MICHEL
r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
Le samedi 28 août 2010 à 11:14, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com a écrit :
The problem is that we got data also from some GIS companies who
wanted non commercial only. The cc protected them in some way. I will
have
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 28 August 2010 15:37, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
please see this as well,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ODbL_comments_from_Creative_Commons
What is missing
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:12 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes it is true that it is a contract. It is contructed this way to
make sure that internationally everyone gets the same
Hello,
I would like to know if the new license is compatible with the old one.
will we be able to use CC-SA-2.0 licensed data or we will have to get
new contracts with the donators of data?
for example, we have gotten much of the data for Kosovo donated under
written contract for CC-SA-20, many
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Albertas Agejevas a...@pov.lt wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:50:50AM +0200, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
2010/4/22 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net
Am 22.04.2010 02:51, schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
No other data gatherer in the world has
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I would be interested in your thoughts on the legal situation here. Is
distributing an OSM-derived data set on such a closed platform still
Hey,
I started a similar project
http://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/OAD-Open-Address-Database
who was first?
mike
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
Hi All,
I saw that http://www.openaddresses.org/ is using
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ does that
!
mike
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Gent Thaçi gent...@gmail.com wrote:
Amazing!
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:47 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
we have a signature for releasing the city map of shkoder for
openstreetmap.
thank you to Namik
I have tried to write to them,
but all of the contact pages are 404 broken.
I guess the internet filter of AU is working well!
mike
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Stefan Neufeind
openstreet...@stefan-neufeind.de wrote:
On 02/11/2010 11:08 AM, Oliver Kuehn (skobbler) wrote:
Hi Mike,
you
...@googlemail.com
Cc: lorant.cza...@unoosa.org, chris.nicho...@unoosa.org,
pekka.tiai...@cmcfinland.fi, tir...@unicef.org, space...@unoosa.org
The maps are freely available. A reference (German Aerospace Center,
DLR) would be nice.
Regards,
Hendrik
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jamesmikedup
One issue is that copyright assignment does not work in europe,
the fsfe has worked on some of these issues.
http://www.fsfe.org/projects/ftf/fla.en.html
see also :
http://lwn.net/Articles/359013/
This is how coding/etc. for money works in Europe too -- you retain your
moral rights, but your
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Chris Fleming m...@chrisfleming.org wrote:
I'm not sure what you're going to achieve here. You can't use there
POI's directly as they will have probably been derived from google's
aerial imagery. If you are planning on visiting the places anyway then
just go on
25 matches
Mail list logo
