There is a list of incompatbile changesets here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quick_History_Service/Changeset_Lists#Tainted_Changesets
IMHO the best would be for Pavel to accept, but that naturally depends
on him.
Simon
Am 04.04.2012 11:53, schrieb "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]":
> "Petr Morá
"Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I went through Pavel's changesets and I think I've found all the tainted
> data. Here is what I did:
>
> 1) I went through Pavel's changesets (except the big ones already
> identified as ODbL compatible imports).
> 2) Counted the number of created or
Pavel Machek wrote:
>> If this is that case, I personally volunteer to help track down your
>> changesets containing the incompatible imports.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> The only two are the wikipedia imports of places and railway stations,
>> is this correct?
>
> I think so.
>
2012/4/2 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" :
> Hi,
>
> I admit that I'm pretty confused right now... Are you saying that you've
> changed your mind and are willing to agree to ODbL+CT, except for the
> changesets containing imports of incompatible data? That would be really
> great!
>
> If this is that cas
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So lets start by saying that I don't like ODbL and I hate CT.
>
> There are three classes of data I uploaded to osm:
>
> a) Hand created data, most important paths in the woods. CT+ODbL, is
> okay for those.
>
> b) ODbL compatible - mass imports. CT+ODbL is okay
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So lets start by saying that I don't like ODbL and I hate CT.
>
> There are three classes of data I uploaded to osm:
>
> a) Hand created data, most important paths in the woods. CT+ODbL, is
> okay for those.
>
> b) ODbL compatible - mas
