Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-10 Thread Ed Avis
Frederik Ramm frederik@... writes: It looks like with the release of CC 4.0 there may be two share-alike licenses suitable for data with different copyleft provisions. CC with a stronger copyleft and ODbL with a weaker one that allows produced works under a non-free license. I don't think it is

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-10 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, minor point of correction: On 04/10/12 12:32, Ed Avis wrote: However, for those who don't want to be quite so open, the ODbL has made a concession by allowing the concept of a Produced Work. Your resulting work does not have to be licensed under any particular terms. However, if you

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-09 Thread Kolossos
From my side it would be also interesting to be able to move CC-content (e.g. from Wikipedia - WikiData -Open Government) to OSM. Not sure how to make it compatible in this direction, perhaps is dual-licensing a solution. Greetings Kolossos ___

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-07 Thread Rob Myers
On 04/04/2012 01:33 PM, Ed Avis wrote: I guess the number 1 requirement for CC4, from an OSM point of view, is that it be interoperable with the ODbL. I recommend that people define compatible and interoperable thoroughly when discussing them, as they can mean different things in different

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-07 Thread Paul Norman
From: Rob Myers [mailto:r...@robmyers.org] Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 10:08 AM To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft) On 04/04/2012 01:33 PM, Ed Avis wrote: I guess the number 1 requirement for CC4, from an OSM point of view

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-07 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 04/07/2012 07:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote: It looks like with the release of CC 4.0 there may be two share-alike licenses suitable for data with different copyleft provisions. CC with a stronger copyleft and ODbL with a weaker one that allows produced works under a non-free license. I

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-07 Thread Rob Myers
On 04/07/2012 07:14 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 04/07/2012 07:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote: It looks like with the release of CC 4.0 there may be two share-alike licenses suitable for data with different copyleft provisions. CC with a stronger copyleft and ODbL with a weaker one that allows

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-04 Thread Ed Avis
I guess the number 1 requirement for CC4, from an OSM point of view, is that it be interoperable with the ODbL. Firstly so that those who are building applications using OSM data today would be able to keep doing what they are doing even if OSM started using CC4 in future, and secondly so that

[OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)

2012-04-02 Thread Kai Krueger
Hi, I have just seen that Creative-Commons has released a first draft of their new 4.0 license suit and thought it might be of interest to others on this list. ( http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32157 ) The draft for 4.0 now explicitly licenses database rights and addresses licensing of