Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

2015-11-23 Thread Simon Poole
Am 23.11.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Andrew Harvey: > I consume OSM data, adapt it for my needs by adjusting OSM geometries > to match CC-BY licensed aerial imagery, and then publish the result > publicly. > > Are you -actually- doing this or would like to it or is this a thought experiment?

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

2015-11-23 Thread Andrew Harvey
Yes I'm actually doing it. On beyondtracks.com I take OSM geometries and adapted them into walking routes. Occasionally I've actually modified these geometries for better accuracy against the government's CC BY imagery. I thought this would be okay so long as I comply with both licenses via

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

2015-11-22 Thread Andrew Harvey
On 23 November 2015 at 13:27, Paul Norman wrote: > CC BY 3.0 doesn't allow you to do this, as it requires you to impose > conditions not present in the ODbL. When I publish my new work, I add all the required attributions and statements required by the CC-BY 3.0 license (in

[OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

2015-11-22 Thread Andrew Harvey
I consume OSM data, adapt it for my needs by adjusting OSM geometries to match CC-BY licensed aerial imagery, and then publish the result publicly. To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap Contributors under the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

2015-11-22 Thread Andrew Harvey
On 23 November 2015 at 13:06, Andrew Harvey wrote: > To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results > contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap > Contributors under the Open Database License > http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright;.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing a combined OSM adapted and CC-BY derived work

2015-11-22 Thread Paul Norman
On 11/22/2015 6:19 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: On 23 November 2015 at 13:06, Andrew Harvey wrote: >To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results >contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap >Contributors under the Open Database License