Am 23.11.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Andrew Harvey:
> I consume OSM data, adapt it for my needs by adjusting OSM geometries
> to match CC-BY licensed aerial imagery, and then publish the result
> publicly.
>
>
Are you -actually- doing this or would like to it or is this a thought
experiment?
Yes I'm actually doing it. On beyondtracks.com I take OSM geometries and
adapted them into walking routes. Occasionally I've actually modified these
geometries for better accuracy against the government's CC BY imagery. I
thought this would be okay so long as I comply with both licenses via
On 23 November 2015 at 13:27, Paul Norman wrote:
> CC BY 3.0 doesn't allow you to do this, as it requires you to impose
> conditions not present in the ODbL.
When I publish my new work, I add all the required attributions and
statements required by the CC-BY 3.0 license (in
I consume OSM data, adapt it for my needs by adjusting OSM geometries
to match CC-BY licensed aerial imagery, and then publish the result
publicly.
To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results
contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap
Contributors under the
On 23 November 2015 at 13:06, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results
> contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap
> Contributors under the Open Database License
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright;.
On 11/22/2015 6:19 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On 23 November 2015 at 13:06, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>To comply with the OSM data's ODBL license, my published results
>contain a notice that it is "based on data (c) OpenStreetMap
>Contributors under the Open Database License