I've been thinking about this for quite some time, but have not been
able to come up with anything useful so please help me. I think we
have a big problem with the choice of CT + ODBL, it is very unclear to
people that ODBL data can not be uploaded to Openstreetmap. It's
obvious that the data is
The LWG might actually publish a formal guideline on the subject, but my
informal 2c for now:
- it is fairly clear that you -could- import 3rd party ODbL licensed
data under the CT (naturally assuming every other box for an import has
been ticked too). The CTs only require compatibility with the
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
- which leads to the question -should- you import ODbL licenced data.
Obviously the answer to that is highly subjective, my position is that I
wouldn't, but others may differ.
So, you mean that the main objection to import
Am 25.04.2014 16:17, schrieb Pieren:
...
So, you mean that the main objection to import ODBL data is a future
licence change. But I remember some past messages here or elsewhere
that the licence process is so heavy and requires so high acceptance
that a licence change is almost
Am 25.04.2014 14:00, schrieb Erik Johansson:
http://www.mapillary.com/osm.html
I probably should have added that I see no problem at all with the terms
Mapillary specifies, since for contributions to OSM it only specifies
that it should happen under the terms of the CTs. IMHO naturally.
