On 21 March 2011 14:53, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 4:23 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do
Hi,
Robert Kaiser wrote:
I think all
that is needed is a clear statement from OSMF saying that they don't
feel responsible for chasing up violators
Such a statement would invite everyone to use our data freely and
without attribution or license care as it basically says the
organization
Francis wrote:
I certainly agree that taking legal action should be low on any list.
It can be expensive, risky and time consuming.
+1
If you want to prevent unattributed uses and so on, having a dedicated
team of volunteers to work out the best approaches (and different
This is a general question for discussion from the License Working
Group. I may also ask on the main list as the constituency is different.
There are now 1 to 2 reports every month of folks violating OSM's
license by using OSM's data or maps without any or without adequate
CC-BY-SA
there is this page in the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
to document and keep trace.
cheers,
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Mike,
There are now 1 to 2 reports every month of folks violating OSM's
license by using OSM's data or maps without any or without adequate
CC-BY-SA attribution and they take several weeks to fix on average.
I agree that this should not burden the LWG.
We have this community-run lacking
