; automatically detect imports from TrackSource maps and report the
>> changesets to OSMF for a mass reversal. Meanwhile I'm trying to
>> prevent the TrackSource folks from losing interest in OSM.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>>>> From
2 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>>> From: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:24 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Which legislation applies: server or data
>>> location?
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian has already giv
e I'm trying to
prevent the TrackSource folks from losing interest in OSM.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>> From: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:24 AM
>> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Which legislation applies:
> From: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Which legislation applies: server or data
> location?
>
>
> Ian has already given a good answer. So just a couple of further notes:
Some more notes, from
Ian has already given a good answer. So just a couple of further notes:
- we want our data to be useful and usable in as many countries as
possible, there are some areas where that is very difficult to achieve,
however this is in general not intellectual property law related
- the history of the
On 27 August 2013 12:04, Fernando Trebien wrote:
> Amidst hard questions in the Brazilian community, I've been wondering
> which copyright legislation should apply to OpenStreetMap's data (in
> the case of suspicious data imports): that of where the data is stored
> and provided from (seems to be
Hello everyone,
Amidst hard questions in the Brazilian community, I've been wondering
which copyright legislation should apply to OpenStreetMap's data (in
the case of suspicious data imports): that of where the data is stored
and provided from (seems to be from the UK right now) or that of where
t
