Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))

sent from a phone > Il giorno 21 set 2016, alle ore 09:54, Janko Mihelić ha > scritto: > > and only show which OSM data is wrong according to the closed source. Then > mappers would go survey the shop. Would this be OK? I am not sure if publishing the differences would

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))

sri, 21. ruj 2016. u 10:42 Martin Koppenhoefer napisao je: > > I am not sure if publishing the differences would be ok, but looking at > them to decide where to survey is ok I think. > This service would be a personal tool for people to use, so no publishing. Although

[OSM-legal-talk] Using closed sources to spot errors (was: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin))

sri, 21. ruj 2016. u 08:54 joost schouppe napisao je: > > Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright > violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that). > This is an interesting case. I think we are allowed to spot errors using