[OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-01-20 Thread Blake Girardot HOT/OSM
Greetings, We are working with an imagery provider who is going to release some of their imagery under cc-by-nc 4.0, and with a specific allowance for it to be used for digitizing into OSM. Their main goal as I understand it, is to make sure their imagery is cc-by-nc 4.0, but they are fine if it

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-01-20 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Saturday 21 January 2017, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM wrote: > > We are working with an imagery provider who is going to release some > of their imagery under cc-by-nc 4.0, and with a specific allowance > for it to be used for digitizing into OSM. Our general aim should be to get image providers to

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Series of maps for Angola

2017-01-20 Thread Marcus Love
Hi Christoph, Thanks for the response. I reviewed the substantial guidelines, and I feel that it would be substantial as if I used it for one admin line, I'd want to use it for the entire country. And as you say below, that if I use my own source of admin boundaries to form language

[OSM-legal-talk] Series of maps for Angola

2017-01-20 Thread Marcus Love
To whom it may concern, I work with SIL International keeping language maps for the Ethnologue up-to-date for countries in Africa. We are in the process of making a series of language maps by province in Angola in coordination with the government of Angola. We are considering using OSM as a

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Series of maps for Angola

2017-01-20 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Friday 20 January 2017, Marcus Love wrote: > I was > thinking, that if I use OSM as a background, that I could edit the > language polygons that we have to follow along OSM admin boundaries > where they coincide. However, if I do that, would it then make those > polygons that I've edited a