Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-01-21 Thread Blake Girardot HOT/OSM
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote: > However care should be taken that the mapper is in a solid situation > when using the data independent of the question if his/her work > actually makes it into the main OSM database. In the past this has > often

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-01-23 Thread Blake Girardot HOT/OSM
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Simon Poole wrote: > > In any case, getting permission to distribute on ODbL terms only would > seem to be suboptimal and endangers any contributions based on so > licensed material as any license change, even in name only, would cause > issues

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-01-23 Thread Blake Girardot HOT/OSM
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > Blake where is the imagery provider in question based? > United States Cheers blake > Simon > > > Am 23.01.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 P

[OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-01-20 Thread Blake Girardot HOT/OSM
Greetings, We are working with an imagery provider who is going to release some of their imagery under cc-by-nc 4.0, and with a specific allowance for it to be used for digitizing into OSM. Their main goal as I understand it, is to make sure their imagery is cc-by-nc 4.0, but they are fine if it

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-01-26 Thread Blake Girardot HOT/OSM
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Christoph Hormann <chris_horm...@gmx.de> wrote: > On Saturday 21 January 2017, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM wrote: >> > However care should be taken that the mapper is in a solid >> > situation when using the data independent of the question if

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-04-06 Thread Blake Girardot HOT/OSM
t; > Am 23.01.2017 um 23:23 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > > Blake where is the imagery provider in question based? > > United States > > Cheers > blake > > > Simon > > >

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

2017-04-07 Thread Blake Girardot HOT/OSM
nternally and get back > to you. > > Simon > > > Am 23.01.2017 um 23:23 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > > Blake where is the imagery provider in question based? > > United States > &