Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Michael Steffen
Hi Tobias - :) I will get in trouble with my team if I veer into a pricing discussion, but like I said, shoot me an email with what you're working on, and I can at least connect you with the right folks to talk to. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Tobias Wendorff < tobias.wendo...@tu-dortmund.de>

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Am Di, 6.09.2016, 20:14 schrieb Michael Steffen: > > We have hundreds of customers hosting their own private data on our secure > infrastructure. Many customers are also hosting private data that they > license from 3rd parties. Give me a holler if you want to talk. Good post > about private maps

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Michael Steffen
Hi Tobias - The rendered image is a Produced Work (no different than a printed map), so the combination is fine. There's no real difference vs rendering a combined image from raster tiles. We have hundreds of customers hosting their own private data on our secure infrastructure. Many customers are

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Am Di, 6.09.2016, 18:34 schrieb Jeffrey Johnson: > Tobias, note there are a few options for serving your own MVT pbf > tiles outside of the mapbox ecosystem. Check projects like > https://github.com/pka/t-rex and https://github.com/terranodo/tegola Thanks! I'll play around on my machine with this.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
Tobias, note there are a few options for serving your own MVT pbf tiles outside of the mapbox ecosystem. Check projects like https://github.com/pka/t-rex and https://github.com/terranodo/tegola Also, we just setup a Vector Tiles list on osgeo to discuss this type of thing. https://lists.osgeo.org/

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Am Di, 6.09.2016, 17:33 schrieb Michael Steffen: > > This should be totally fine. Feel free to reach out directly if you > want to talk in more detail. Yeah, I might contact you in the next days. A problem could be that I have to upload the non-free data to Mapbox. This might violate the data's co

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Am Di, 6.09.2016, 17:08 schrieb Rory McCann: > > Not really. Vector tiles (*.mvt) are protobuf files, not sqlite files > (you might be thinking of mbtiles). It doesn't really matter for your > example, since you could filter a mvt file to split out the different > layers. Yeah, I messed this up -

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Michael Steffen
Hi Tobias - Michael at Mapbox here. Just overlay, no other interaction. This should be totally fine. Feel free to reach out directly if you want to talk in more detail. -Michael On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Rory McCann wrote: > On 06/09/16 15:13, Tobias Wendorff wrote: > > Actually, thes

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Vector Tiles: ODbL and non-free data

2016-09-06 Thread Rory McCann
On 06/09/16 15:13, Tobias Wendorff wrote: > Actually, these vector formats are modified SQLite databases Not really. Vector tiles (*.mvt) are protobuf files, not sqlite files (you might be thinking of mbtiles). It doesn't really matter for your example, since you could filter a mvt file to split o