[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Licences not listed on the Licensing wiki page

[Tom Callaway]

On 05/17/2018 02:41 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Recently I've downloaded the primary.xml for F28 and ran a check comparing 
> the licences of packages in the repo against good licences listed on the 
> Licensing wiki page.
> There are a couple licences that are used by a few packages, but I couldn't 
> find them on the wiki page. It might be good to review these licences and add 
> them to the wiki page, or ask maintainers to change the package License: tags 
> in case the licence is already listed, but under a different identifier.
> 
> - Array (used by gcin)

Added.

> - BSL-1.0 (used by ceph, librados2 and others)

As much as I value consistency, I am not going to cause a fuss over the
use of the SPDX identifier here.

> - Freely redistributable without restriction (used by alienarena-data, 
> beneath-a-steel-sky and others)

This is only kosher for content, but that is how it is being used.

> - PDDL-1.0 (used by python-nibabel)

Added.

~tom
___
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JJGTXM3XAOLIMMYGNLAM5AIOGFY2H3NW/

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Licences not listed on the Licensing wiki page

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On jeudi 17 mai 2018 20:55:51 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > - Array (used by gcin)
> 
> Eh, I don't know what this is.
I've seen this packaqe a while ago and had to search the license too. Array is 
https://web.archive.org/web/20170821225607/http://www.array.com.tw:80/company/
array_license.pdf

The company and license seems defunct.

___
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UULX2I6KZQUHMAXCKCFUZIRC26FRJVVC/

[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Licences not listed on the Licensing wiki page

[Neal Gompa]

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:42 PM Artur Iwicki  wrote:

> Hello.

> Recently I've downloaded the primary.xml for F28 and ran a check
comparing the licences of packages in the repo against good licences listed
on the Licensing wiki page.
> There are a couple licences that are used by a few packages, but I
couldn't find them on the wiki page. It might be good to review these
licences and add them to the wiki page, or ask maintainers to change the
package License: tags in case the licence is already listed, but under a
different identifier.

> - Array (used by gcin)

Eh, I don't know what this is.

> - BSL-1.0 (used by ceph, librados2 and others)

This is the SPDX identifier for the Boost license. Ceph packaging in Fedora
follows openSUSE packaging guidelines.

> - Freely redistributable without restriction (used by alienarena-data,
beneath-a-steel-sky and others)

This was a phrase that was documented at some point for game data, I think?

> - PDDL-1.0 (used by python-nibabel)


This is the SPDX identifier for Public Domain & Dedication License:
https://spdx.org/licenses/PDDL-1.0.html



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
legal mailing list -- legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4V6IL7GAVMODNOZHC3X6D3OXGHRPFM4P/