Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
I think it's best to define imperialism broadly as what is necessary
to ensure the continued reproduction of capitalism, subjecting all to
the discipline of the world market (which may _de-industrialize_
large parts of the world, depending on its systemic needs),
eign aid. A kind of collective
welfare for the relative surplus population (the majority of the world's
population)
4- Socialist revolution, esp. in the imperialist countries.
I'm with option 4, options 1-3 are what we have today.
Sam Pawlett
[p.s. Lou-I'm going to crosspost to Marxism
Leys is a specialist in "development theory", Africa in particular.
According to Sam Pawlett, he comes at things from the same angle as Robert
Brenner which is to say that he is skeptical of the"development of
underdevelopment" thesis--another way of saying that imperial
