Suppose the same
piece had been signed by yours truly? Would you dismiss it the same way?
Asking Me? I did not forward anything from LBO. So I can not technically dismiss
something I was not part of. .
I must point out that this mail was sent out to many people (such as myself) that
No one on LBO talk could last five postings in a debate with the
Leninists who "dwell" on L-I, and they would never subject their fragile egos to
several posts with us anyways), but rather forwarded something from the "Week".
It is true that they tend to avoid debate, but nonetheless there are
En relacin a Re: Teaching: [L-I] Learning (was Re: Congo),
el 22 Jan 01, a las 0:40, Mine Aysen Doyran dijo (to my deep sorrow):
Try to grow upYoshie and stop teaching how to build the left to old timers
like Lou. If your pretension is to recover the reputation of a right wing
cult--LM
Hi Nestor!
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote:
En relacin a Re: Teaching: [L-I] Learning (was Re: Congo),
el 22 Jan 01, a las 0:40, Mine Aysen Doyran dijo (to my deep sorrow):
Try to grow upYoshie and stop teaching how to build the left to old timers
like Lou. If your pretension
I don't recommend the mode of argument -- if you can call it that --
that you are employing here. In many circles, purist leftists tried
to discredit _everything_ that Michel Chossudovsky wrote because he
cited a couple of right-wing sources in his articles, etc.; _all_
info provided by
Try to grow upYoshie and stop teaching how to build the left to old timers
like Lou. If your pretension is to recover the reputation of a right wing
cult--LM-- and its long time defenders like J. H., I would just recommend you
to improve on where you left on pen-l. Why to post J.H here, but not
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
Lou writes:
Well, I know that not everybody on L-I has a liking for Heartfield, and
yours
truly has personally clashed with him on first acquaintance. But this
posting
is at least as enlightening as Patrick's.
Never runs smooth the path of true love, or
