On Sep 21, 11:45 am, VR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\rst3.py, line 1222, in writeSpecialTree
os.mkdir(dir)
WindowsError: [Error 3] Das System kann den angegebenen Pfad nicht
finden: u'C:\\Python25\\Lib\\site-packages\\Leo-4-5-1-2-final\\2008\
\09'
I fixed this several days ago, in rev
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's widely agreed that
Qt is better (== faster, more features, ...) of the two (esp. after
Qt4), and Gtk is playing catchup. Gtk has just a more liberal license,
which makes it more attractive to some
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's just a bunch of references I bump into on the web, every now and
then. Google for qt gtk comparison.
The top hits aren't very helpful, and seem to indicate unhappiness
with the comparisons.
The only downside qt
On Sep 29, 6:27 am, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. The gui issue is becoming urgent, for at least two
reasons.
I see at http://www.learningpython.com/2008/09/20/an-introduction-to-pyqt/
that PyQt requires Python 2.5 or above. I don't think this will be a
problem: in
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's widely agreed that
Qt is better (== faster, more features, ...) of the two (esp. after
Qt4), and Gtk is playing catchup. Gtk has just a more liberal license,
which makes it more attractive to some
On Sep 29, 6:36 am, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from all this, Qt look-and-feel (and performance) is what the
kids want. Tk lacks the snappiness and glitz people expect from
their apps. On Linux, Tk looks like it came from the early 90's ;-)
You don't need to convince me
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, there is. Try downloading pyqt.
http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/software/pyqt/download
One point for Qt again: it's a much simpler download than Gtk (on windows).
--
Ville M. Vainio
http://tinyurl.com/vainio
Rev 1162 of the trunk fixes the following two errors in C/C++ syntax
coloring:
1. Errors with extended preprocessing directives
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor/browse_thread/thread/707a910f975f3715
2. Errors with doxygen comments
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:29 PM, zpcspm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would guess every linux distribution has Qt4 available by now...If
not, change the distribution ;-)
Not quite every distribution, but it seems to be a minor problem. A
bit of googling revealed that it is possible to install
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:14 PM, zpcspm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 29, 2:36 pm, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from all this, Qt look-and-feel (and performance) is what the
kids want.
Reading this made me smile since leo doesn't look like a toy for kids
to me :-)
It
Hi everyone,
I read about Leo and I like to use it as PIM, unfortunately Leo
doesn't support RTL mode, from what I read about Tk, it can support
RTL mode, I am not a programmer, I don't know how much work needed to
support RTL.
I just want to know if you can add this feature.
Thank you,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/software/pyqt/download
Excellent. Thanks for the link.
And a good place to get started might be reading the source code of
qleolite (all 94 lines of it, if you leave out the
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:12:42 +0300
Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gtk is held down by the various bad design decisions
they made back in the day (one of those being choosing C + GObject
instead of C++).
There is a native C++ wrapper for Gtk I think? I believe inkscape is
currently
13 matches
Mail list logo
