Ed, please demonstrate how to use Leo with the following short program

2017-02-05 Thread Sr U
https://www.programiz.com/python-programming/examples/calculator Ed, At the risk of offending (absolutely not what I am intending as I want HELP), I suspect Leo is not catching on because of marketing errors. Specifically, you haven't recognized and properly met the needs of Leo's NATURAL

Re: ENB: urls and pictures in the body pane

2017-02-05 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 02:16:15 -0800 (PST) "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > 1. I am thinking that what we really want is your (Terry's) new VR4 > widget, or whatever you call it. > > Do I remember correctly that this pane would allow both rendered and > "raw" views of text.  If so,

Proposed changes to wikiview settings

2017-02-05 Thread Edward K. Ream
I propose making a modest change to the wikiview settings in @data wikiview-link-patterns Every pattern must start with *and *match a *unique* *lead-in character*. The lead-in character is the first character of the pattern, excluding a leading "\b", open parens and (maybe) other escapes.

Re: ENB: urls and pictures in the body pane

2017-02-05 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 4:16:15 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > reconciling the wikiview plugin with the new colorizer is turning into a >> headache. I'll say more about this in #388 >>

Re: ENB: urls and pictures in the body pane

2017-02-05 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 4:16:15 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: reconciling the wikiview plugin with the new colorizer is turning into a > headache. I'll say more about this in #388 > itself. > Done. The colorizer must hide

Re: ENB: urls and pictures in the body pane

2017-02-05 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:42:18 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: images in the body editor could save a lot of real estate during demos, for > instance. I'm pretty sure that we will enjoy having this feature. And why > turn our backs on a really cool feature? > I'm going for put this