Re: Rendering math in Leo

On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 9:05:44 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > Leo can already render LaTex math markup using reStructuredText . But not very well. The viewrendered plugin can also render @pyplot nodes,

Re: Web help wanted: viewing Joe Orr's Leo view page locally

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:56 AM, vitalije wrote: > `npm run build` must be executed in terminal inside project folder. > Project is what you get by git cloning repository https://github.com/ > kaleguy/leoviewer not leo-examples. > I haven't tried it, just guessing. >

Re: Rendering math in Leo

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Terry Brown wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:05:44 -0700 (PDT) > "Edward K. Ream" wrote: > > > Leo can already render LaTex math markup using reStructuredText > > Although I quite like reStructuredText my impression is

Playing well with other apps, tools and languages

​In another thread I wrote: "Leo can already render LaTex math markup using reStructuredText . But not very well." ​It may be possible to better render LaTeX ​using the richtext.py plugin. I haven't tried it

Rendering math in Leo

Leo can already render LaTex math markup using reStructuredText . But not very well. Enter the following in any body pane, and look at the results in the viewrendered pane. Blank lines are significant in some

Re: Anyone know how to update Leo's pypi index?

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:28:53 -0700 (PDT) lewis wrote: > On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 1:31:52 PM UTC+11, Matt Wilkie wrote: > You're welcome. I'm happy to contribute. > > I think it's worth persisting a bit longer; `pip install thing` > is the mainstream method and

Re: Anyone know how to update Leo's pypi index?

On Friday, October 20, 2017 at 1:31:52 PM UTC+11, Matt Wilkie wrote: > > You're welcome. I'm happy to contribute. > > I think it's worth persisting a bit longer; `pip install thing` is the > mainstream method and now that PyQt can be installed with pip on py3+ the > biggest roadblock to a

Re: Anyone know how to update Leo's pypi index?

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Matt Wilkie wrote: Thanks for clarifying that it's chiefly the announcement you were after. If > my next couple of sessions working with setup.py don't result in a recipe > that any maintainer can follow with a minimum of fuss I'll go ahead and

Re: Improved 'extract' command

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: ​I don't see an importer for clojurescript, but it probably would not be > too difficult to create it. > ​Presumably the clojure importer would be a slight modification of plugins/importers/elisp.py.​ Edward -- You