I think it's also about building on Jupyter concepts as reproducible
literate programming platform, not just cloning its current functionality
See it as an alternative to the JupyterLab application
(https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/PyData/Seattle2017/BRK11), reusing the
same capabilities from
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
>
> > Does this vision match yours? Here are some initial thoughts.
>
> My thoughts, which include a lot of groundless assumptions about how
> Jupyter works, would be that we have a new node type:
>
[big snip]
Thanks
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Edward K. Ream
wrote:
>
> > I'll run my typical tests in the branch and let you know soon.
>
> Here are some minor problems.
>
I'm good with you merging this branch provided that you update
LeoPyRef.leo and create a project describing
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
Either way - the "branch-notes" folder approach is part of the repo.,
> whereas projects are a separate github thing, but I'm sure there'll be
> an API for downloading them, and branches are supposed to be transient
>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Matt Wilkie wrote:
> Jumping in for just pandoc part of the thread: I happened upon `pypandoc`
> today when looking in to better formatting of the Leo PyPi page overview:
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pypandoc. A simple implementation of which