On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:35:38 -0800
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Terry Brown
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 06:16:23 -0800
> > "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for raising this topic. I have been meaning to say a few
> > > deprecating words about g.
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:45:15 -0800
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Terry Brown
> wrote:
>
> > An addition to the vs-* commands, vs-eval-replace, replaces the
> > selected body text with its evaluated form.
> >
>
> Thanks for this. Are you thinking of this as a k
On Saturday, December 23, 2017 at 9:45:17 AM UTC-8, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Terry Brown
> wrote:
>
>> An addition to the vs-* commands, vs-eval-replace, replaces the
>> selected body text with its evaluated form.
>>
>
> Thanks for this.
>
Oh, and well
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Terry Brown wrote:
> An addition to the vs-* commands, vs-eval-replace, replaces the
> selected body text with its evaluated form.
>
Thanks for this. Are you thinking of this as a kind of repl
(read-eval-print-loop)? I am.
Edward
--
You received this mess
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 06:16:23 -0800
> "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
>
> > Thanks for raising this topic. I have been meaning to say a few
> > deprecating words about g.Bunch myself.
>
> What don't you like about g.Bunch?
>
I don't like that it'
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 06:16:23 -0800
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> Thanks for raising this topic. I have been meaning to say a few
> deprecating words about g.Bunch myself.
What don't you like about g.Bunch?
g.Bunch was not what I was speaking against. The pattern I'm
finding most awkward for ext
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
Twice in the log links to nodes branch I had to work around tuples as
> stand-ins for light weight types.
>
I agree. And I don't think this is an off topic discussion.
I have almost always come to regret g.Bunch. In my experience, any slig
On Saturday, December 23, 2017 at 5:56:02 AM UTC-8, Edward K. Ream wrote:
*Summary*
>>
>> The requirement that no node contain multiple @others directives means
>> that a function that defines multiple interior functions must split those
>> functions into multiple direct children.
>>
>> The cont
On Friday, December 22, 2017 at 12:49:21 PM UTC-8, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> 2. The question about how faithfully to recreate (round-trip) existing
code is fraught with unexpected and vexing difficulties.
The present importers all carefully deal with the issues of line breaks and
leading whitespa
