Back to No-Docks

2020-08-27 Thread Thomas Passin
I am so fed up with --use-docks that I've given up on it and gone back to the older no-docks configuration. With docks, I can never count on the panes being the same next time I re-open an outline or restart Leo. Sometimes they are hard to restore to my liking, too. Especially during plugin

Re: leo\doc\LeoDocs.leo.orig

2020-08-27 Thread Brian Theado
This commit on Aug 16th introduced the LeoDocs.leo.orig file: https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/commit/acd73c59151c9f5304daa4ce08017c6cc7ec3857 I don't see any related PR merge commit, so probably it was pushed directly to the devel branch without a PR. Git only tracks information about

Re: Defining Attributes

2020-08-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:51 AM k-hen wrote: > Thanks guys, yes it does certainly help :-) > > I'm really liking the idea of the single extra dimension for the > attributes, and I'd like to help make them more prominent, > there doesn't seem to be anything from the front-end to be able to >

Re: ch ch changes

2020-08-27 Thread Matt Wilkie
And thank you also in turn Edward! You welcomed and advised on my first fumbling attempts, and other similarly not-great ones afterwards until I reached stable enough ground to meaningful things. As did Terry and Ville and Kent and Jacob and a host of others I am failing to recall at the

Re: ENB: Ahas re positions

2020-08-27 Thread Félix
Realized it was silly, & changed my mind about the 'saved with the leo file' part. I removed the last message On Thursday, August 27, 2020 at 10:00:54 AM UTC-4, Félix wrote: > > (continuing my example) > > It's not about which command to run if expanded/collapsed, its about which > will be

Re: ENB: Ahas re positions

2020-08-27 Thread Félix
forgot to add that although I would consider the collapse-state part of the model, just like structure, headline lable and body, it's *not *to be saved with the file, (it is volatile) and is lost / reset when opening the Leo file. On Thursday, August 27, 2020 at 10:00:54 AM UTC-4, Félix wrote:

Re: Defining Attributes

2020-08-27 Thread k-hen
Thanks guys, yes it does certainly help :-) I'm really liking the idea of the single extra dimension for the attributes, and I'd like to help make them more prominent, there doesn't seem to be anything from the front-end to be able to natively interact with them (like maybe a attribute subtree

Re: ENB: Ahas re positions

2020-08-27 Thread Félix
(continuing my example) It's not about which command to run if expanded/collapsed, its about which will be selected when the command is run. (if we're considering the command 'selectNextVisible', for instance... So what is computed by the controller, is which p node to set the selection to,

Re: Defining Attributes

2020-08-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 5:53 PM k-hen wrote: > Yes, I think that workflow is extremely compelling! > I think a full graph database integration is my ultimate goal, but this > could be something really excellent to build off of. > > See here: https://github.com/totogo/awesome-knowledge-graph >

Re: ENB: Ahas re positions

2020-08-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 11:19:56 AM UTC-5, vitalije wrote: I doubt this would be a very good idea. Undo/redo already has a lot of > things to do. Adding some more chores to them will likely make things more > complicated, slower and probably introduce more bugs. > Yes, what I now call

Re: ENB: Ahas re positions

2020-08-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 9:16:54 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: For several years now, Vitalije has rightly complained that copied > positions can become invalid when the outline changes. > Let me restate the problem I am trying to solve: 1. I would like a subset of positions to

Re: ch ch changes

2020-08-27 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:20 PM Matt Wilkie wrote: > > As you've noticed I've kind of dropped out of Leo participation this > summer. My life seems to have arrived on a pivot and I don't know what > might happen next. > You and everyone else :-) > ...attention on things computery outside of