Re: All importers have been converted!

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 7:02:28 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > Rev d3e7ead is a long-awaited milestone. All importers are subclasses of > the Importer class in linescanner.py, except for the json importer, which > is stand-alone code. > And ceb99177 is another milestone.

Re: All importers have been converted!

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 7:02:28 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: The unit test for the rst importer fail at present. > Hmm. It should be possible to remove the conditional write statement in the rst writer. This would fix the unit tests. But perhaps the conditional statement *is*

Re: All importers have been converted!

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:53 AM, john lunzer wrote: Thank you for your work, it is delightful to see you active and excited. One day I wish to have the time and privilege to maintain Leo. It would be a crime if Leo ever fell into obscurity. I hope to prevent that crime when the

Re: All importers have been converted!

> > After that, my hands are telling me I need a break. We'll see whether I > listen to them. I really should... > Considering you said the same a week ago and didn't, this time you really *should* give them a break. Thank you for your work, it is delightful to see you active and excited.

All importers have been converted!

Rev d3e7ead is a long-awaited milestone. All importers are subclasses of the Importer class in linescanner.py, except for the json importer, which is stand-alone code. None of Leo's importers uses any code in basescanner.py, including the infamous BaseScanner class, and the obsolete