Hello Edward,
On 18 Feb., 03:07, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be safe enough, but as Jelly Roll said, One never knows,
do one.
Just a short info that I'm using rev 4989 w/o having noticed anything
weird.
With kind regards,
Viktor
--
You received this message
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Viktor Ransmayr
viktor.ransm...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a short info that I'm using rev 4989 w/o having noticed anything
weird.
Thanks for testing!
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
leo-editor group.
To post
This should be safe enough, but as Jelly Roll said, One never knows,
do one.
Here is the checkin log:
Q
Many *disabled* changes re failed single-load plan: the present code
should be equivalent to previous rev.
All unit tests pass, pylint is happy, as am I.
The new code is mostly guarded
