The important thing is that the integration has stated to be prototyped.
Those with enough interest and knowledge to take such discussions into
working prototypes will reopen the issues or create new ones, as needed.
As said, after live coding with Pharo, my knowledge/interest/use in/of
Python is l
I gotta agree I didn't understand the emphasis on that, so great.
On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 3:26:47 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> The recent work with a jupyter prototype has mooted these. Furthermore,
> some of the discussions were becoming too long to be useful. We can always
> c
grace for it ;-)
in fact , i think Leo already make same feeling as Jupyter,
but base Leoism ways.
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> The recent work with a jupyter prototype has mooted these. Furthermore,
> some of the discussions were becoming too long to be useful. We c
The recent work with a jupyter prototype has mooted these. Furthermore,
some of the discussions were becoming too long to be useful. We can always
create new discussions as needed.
Edward
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To uns
