On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:42 PM jkn wrote:
Leo doesn't continually check to see whether a .leo file has been changed.
>> The workaround is not to do that. You could file an enhancement request,
>> but I would reject it ;-)
>>
>> Given that Leo does easily (via the menu) allow you to reload a
Hi Edward
On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 11:55:15 AM UTC+1, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:37 AM jkn >
> wrote:
>
> My apologies for the delay in responding.
>
> 4) Separately,
>> touch mytest.leo
>>
>> 5) Change back to Leo.
>> nothing shown(!)
>>
>
> Leo doesn't
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:37 AM jkn wrote:
My apologies for the delay in responding.
4) Separately,
> touch mytest.leo
>
> 5) Change back to Leo.
> nothing shown(!)
>
Leo doesn't continually check to see whether a .leo file has been changed.
The workaround is not to do that. You could
Hi Edward
On Sunday, September 30, 2018 at 11:33:55 AM UTC+1, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:41 AM jkn >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>> I'm trying to understand whether Leo has the ability to reload a file
>> that has been changed from under its feet, as it were.
>>
>
>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:41 AM jkn wrote:
> Hi all
> I'm trying to understand whether Leo has the ability to reload a file
> that has been changed from under its feet, as it were.
>
Leo certainly does have this capability, provided the file actually exists
on disk. You can verify this as
I wonder if I could sneak a feature request in here? I am often guilty of
having files open on different machines and ending up with different
versions - in terror of losing some useful piece of info - I would like a
'merge' option that saves all nodes from the two different files into one
On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 at 12:04:29 AM UTC+1, Matt Wilkie wrote:
>
> I think using the word `overwrite` in this kind of situation causes
>> confusion and a bit of panic.
>>
>
> Yes it has. I have said no and saved copies because of it. Thanks for the
> description of what's actually
>
> I think using the word `overwrite` in this kind of situation causes
> confusion and a bit of panic.
>
Yes it has. I have said no and saved copies because of it. Thanks for the
description of what's actually happening!
Matt
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:16:48 AM UTC+1, vitalije wrote:
>
> There has been some discussion about the formulation of this prompt
> before. I am not 100% sure what was the final result of this discussion,
> but when Leo asks you if you want it to overwrite some file because it was
>
There has been some discussion about the formulation of this prompt before.
I am not 100% sure what was the final result of this discussion, but when
Leo asks you if you want it to overwrite some file because it was changed
on the disk, it means overwrite the version inside Leo with the content
Hi all
I'm trying to understand whether Leo has the ability to reload a file
that has been changed from under its feet, as it were.
Background: I run Owncloud on some of my PCs, where a change to one file
gets propagated to the others. This might include some .leo files.
If I am working on
11 matches
Mail list logo
