Sounds like a best practice to me ;) On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 10:31:54 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > It's simple: each commit marks a place at which all unit tests pass. So > each commit is a rollback point in case things go wrong. Given the > complexity of the present cleanup effort, this is essential. > > This just happened: I was a bit too eager to change the coffeescript > importer. After giving up on fixing the problem *easily*, I rolled back > by copying some code in leoPlugins.leo (much easier than recovering from a > git stash) and then killed the old code by doing `git stash`. > > When *everything* is working with the coffeescript importer, I'll do `git > stash clear` to kill the bad code permanently. > > In short,git allows me to experiment freely, with virtually no worry. > > Edward >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
