Re: Push/pop hoist?

2015-12-02 Thread Phil
> Not 100% clear on your goal - basically cut / yank / push a subtree, > which you're identifying by hoisting, to a stack, rather than the > single content clipboard, and the copy / pop it somewhere else later? > I guess I'm confused by the mix of moving subtrees and hoisting. > > The

Re: Push/pop hoist?

2015-12-02 Thread Jacob Peck
Hmm... Chapters provide a similar function. I use them all the time for this functionality. Hope this helps! -->Jake On 12/2/2015 9:44 AM, Phil wrote: Not 100% clear on your goal - basically cut / yank / push a subtree, which you're identifying by hoisting, to a stack, rather than

Re: Push/pop hoist?

2015-12-02 Thread Phil
> Chapters provide a similar function. I use them all the time for this > functionality. > > > Thanks for the tip, that is helpful. I had looked at chapters in the past but didn't really get how they work. Playing with it again, now I get it. -- You received this message because you are

Re: Push/pop hoist?

2015-12-02 Thread Jacob Peck
The 'problem' with chapters, if you can call it that, is that they 'feel' more permanent -- you're making a change to the tree structure (with @chapter nodes) to accommodate it -- of course, they're disposable if you wish, just not transparently so. -->Jake On 12/2/2015 10:36 AM, Phil wrote:

Re: Push/pop hoist?

2015-12-02 Thread Phil
> The 'problem' with chapters, if you can call it that, is that they 'feel' > more permanent -- you're making a change to the tree structure (with > @chapter nodes) to accommodate it -- of course, they're disposable if you > wish, just not transparently so. > > Sure, that's a good point. I

Re: Push/pop hoist?

2015-12-02 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:52:20 -0800 (PST) Phil wrote: > > The 'problem' with chapters, if you can call it that, is that they > > 'feel' more permanent -- you're making a change to the tree > > structure (with @chapter nodes) to accommodate it -- of course, > > they're

Push/pop hoist?

2015-12-01 Thread Phil
Is there a command that can push the current (hoisted) root node onto a stack, which can later be popped back to the hoisted root position? If not, can someone provide some guidance for how I would implement this functionality myself in a @button? Thanks! Phil -- You received this message

Re: Push/pop hoist?

2015-12-01 Thread 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:16:03 -0800 (PST) Phil wrote: > Is there a command that can push the current (hoisted) root node onto > a stack, which can later be popped back to the hoisted root position? > If not, can someone provide some guidance for how I would implement > this