On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 20:10:04 +0300
Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pysmell seems to operate in tags like manner, and that should be
good enough for most purposes. I.e. generate the completion database
every now
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 10:03:18 -0500
Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My guess is that determining the proper type for x in x.y is the hard
part. Once the type of x is known, finding completions is just a dict
lookup, or should be.
Right - but I think, if I'm reading the vim code for
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right - but I think, if I'm reading the vim code for pysmell correctly,
pysmell will do that part for you, whereas, if I read the ctags API
correctly, ctags won't... unless perhaps you update the tag file with
the contents
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ModuleName.ClassName. [file in the method names] is easyish, but
x = Foo()
a = x. [now what are my choices] is trickier.
This article explains it pretty well:
Bumped on this on planet python:
http://orestis.gr/en/blog/2008/08/31/announcing-pysmell/
It may be something that could be usefull for Leo...
--
Ville M. Vainio - vivainio.googlepages.com
blog=360.yahoo.com/villevainio - g[mail | talk]='vivainio'
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had a quick look, looks interesting, I'm guessing much easier to
integrate than Komodo, although I don't know how it compares to
Komodo. API docs. seem to be lacking (just the way Edward likes it :-)
Heh.
I was thinking
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Terry Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had a quick look, looks interesting, I'm guessing much easier to
integrate than Komodo, although I don't know how it compares to
Komodo. API docs.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Edward K. Ream [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if that can be done fast enough for auto-completion? Perhaps by
caching the text from preceding nodes part of the answer?
Speed is the heart of the matter. In general, stupid scanning is
too slow. There are
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 20:10:04 +0300
Ville M. Vainio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pysmell seems to operate in tags like manner, and that should be
good enough for most purposes. I.e. generate the completion database
every now and then, and just use it (without updating it) in the
interim
Actually
