Re: ENB: Completing #578: support for org-mode tags

2017-11-22 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 10:55:15 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Edward K. Ream > wrote: > > Unless I hear objections, I am going to comment out the code in the org >> mode reader and writer that inserts or delete tags. >> > > ​Done at fde1e6. ### m

Re: ENB: Completing #578: support for org-mode tags

2017-11-21 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: Unless I hear objections, I am going to comment out the code in the org > mode reader and writer that inserts or delete tags. > ​Done at fde1e6. ### marks all changes. I'll be happy to reinstate the code if that's what we decide. But I thin

Re: ENB: Completing #578: support for org-mode tags

2017-11-21 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 9:46:12 AM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: I'll play with declutter today. If it works as I expect it will I'll remove > all the code affected by deleting org-mode tags. > This is the first time I have used declutter, and I think this is going to handle org-mode ta

Re: ENB: Completing #578: support for org-mode tags

2017-11-21 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: automatically stripping org-mode tags has several nasty aspects: > ​And one more: 4. Unit tests must be aware of the setting. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To uns