On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
> > Is there any reason not to create an issue for this?
> No, I should probably do that to clarify current subtasks.
Please do.
Imo it's
the
best
way to keep up with major projects like this.
> I guess recent work
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 10:58:28 -0600
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Terry Brown
> wrote:
>
> Not that it's a reason not to document as I go, but the project's far
> > from finished. It aspires to replace:
> > [snip]
>
>
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
Not that it's a reason not to document as I go, but the project's far
> from finished. It aspires to replace:
> [snip]
>
Is there any reason not to create an issue for this?
I'm confused. Why delete the branch if
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 10:43:35 -0600
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> Thanks. Where would I find documentation for what you did?
Not that it's a reason not to document as I go, but the project's far
from finished. It aspires to replace:
- viewrendered*
- the body pane (with,
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
>
> Is there any reason to retain leo_edit_pane?
...If not, please delete the branch.
> Gone.
Thanks. Where would I find documentation for what you did?
Edward
--
You received this message because you are
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 01:18:08 -0600
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> I see. Is there any reason to retain leo_edit_pane? If there is,
> please update branches.md. If not, please delete the branch :-)
Gone.
Cheers -Terry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Terry Brown wrote:
leo_edit_pane was merged into master (and hence devel) some time ago
> for more exposure / testing. It does *almost* nothing to core, if you
> don't enable the plugin, and even with the plugin enabled, is basically
>
On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:38:57 -0800 (PST)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> We both have discussed this branch recently. I'd like to know as
> much about it as possible.
>
> branches.md is the natural place for these docs. They can contain
> links more lengthy discussions if you