Hi,
I like the direction this is taking. I would like to have Leo bringing
"outlining services" to other programs, including Emacs, Org Mode, Atom,
Jupyter, Vim and/or Pharo.
I imagine some kind of minimal test that allows external programs to
connect to the "Leo Server" and use it from the
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 7:28 AM Terry Brown wrote:
I'm not sure which parts of Leo you're talking about, but #1025 certainly
> helps
> on that front. Still not quite sure about the boundaries.
>
Boundaries are fluid, especially concerning Leo and org mode. I'll be
writing about this in #1026.
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:53:15 -0800 (PST)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> We can make Leo more accessible by integrating Leo's essentials into
> emacs, vim, pyzo or even atom.
I was going to say that I don't understand this project because I'm not
sure which parts of Leo you're talking about, but
Edward:
Also appreciate the glimpse. Also a bit of a younger perspective, as I'm
barely in my twenties.
Recent discussions convince me that Leo is in excellent hands with Terry
> and Vitalije. This is reassuring. Leo is likely to thrive after I am gone.
> It has also been upsetting. I am no
Edward I appreciate this glimpse into your bigger world. A switch of focus
to living in the light has been on my mind too. It's all too easy to snipe
and gripe from the sidelines -- there are so many broken things and foolish
people! (I include myself in both sets) -- and thereby fritter away
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Terry Brown wrote:
I'm not sure that you can be described as non-essential :-}
>
Thanks for the vote of confidence. Eventually I'll be gone, so let's hope
I am not essential then ;-)
> Leo's very much on the large end of ~ one person projects (i.e.
>
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 03:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> Recent discussions convince me that Leo is in excellent hands with
> Terry and Vitalije. This is reassuring. Leo is likely to thrive
> after I am gone. It has also been upsetting. I am no longer an
> essential part of my own
