Re: The big PR did remove some gui-related code

2023-07-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 8:10:10 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 7:14:56 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: I now see that the *full_match* helper function (internal to g.findUNL) *did* contain gui code. Imo removing that code was correct, but there is a chance that

Re: The big PR did remove some gui-related code

2023-07-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 7:14:56 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: I now see that the *full_match* helper function (internal to g.findUNL) *did* contain gui code. Imo removing that code was correct, but there is a chance that doing so created problems. FYI: both the convert_unl_list and the

Re: The big PR did remove some gui-related code

2023-07-08 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 1:07 AM jkn wrote: > I mentioned it, in the thread "Ctrl-Click on gnx fails if the node is > dirty?" > Thanks for the reminder :-) I've just followed the recipe you gave in that thread. Everything works. And even if everything didn't work, putting gui code in full_match

Re: The big PR did remove some gui-related code

2023-07-08 Thread jkn
I mentioned it, in the thread "Ctrl-Click on gnx fails if the node is dirty? " On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 1:14:56 AM UTC+1 Edward K. Ream wrote: > There was some discussion (I don't remember where) about a weird edge > case: changing a clickable link and then undoing the change *without*

The big PR did remove some gui-related code

2023-07-07 Thread Edward K. Ream
There was some discussion (I don't remember where) about a weird edge case: changing a clickable link and then undoing the change *without* saving the file caused Leo not to find the clickable link. I dismissed this nit as likely unrelated to the big PR. However, I now see that the