> Interesting idea. Alas, it is not likely to be easy to do.
I would imagine that it can be modeled in the same way as @ and @c
works, e.g. using @hide and @unhide pair, with everything between them
replaced with nothing for the purpose of the diff. I think @ and @c is
a good model because they a
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:22 AM, resi147 wrote:
> Also I could image that using @shadow it shouldn't be too difficult to
> implement a comments directive,
> as you can keep this comments in the .shadow file only, rather than
> the real file.
Interesting idea. Alas, it is not likely to be easy t
On 10 Mrz., 08:48, vitalije wrote:
> This is a FAQ.
> You should
> readhttp://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/FAQ.html#using-external-files
> There is a FAQ entry: Can @file trees contain material not in the
> external file?
> and also: Why can’t I use @ignore directives in @thin trees?
>
> I hope
This is a FAQ.
You should read
http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/FAQ.html#using-external-files
There is a FAQ entry: Can @file trees contain material not in the
external file?
and also: Why can’t I use @ignore directives in @thin trees?
I hope this would help.
Vitalije
--
You received this
Hi,
what is the best method of keeping some text in the leo file and not
exporting it to @. To make it clearer,
I have a @shadow node with << sub - sections >> and I want some of
this sections to only act as comment
to me rather then being exported to the shadow file, I played around
with @ignore
