Just wondering what the general opinion is--is that a stumbling block
for others? For newbies?
I wouldn't put it as strongly as a 'stumbling block', but I too find
the 'heading' term sweeter.
Jon N
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
I ran lintian (deb sanity checker) on Leo. The only error I got was
with the license file (for talking about GPL - yeah, a false
positive), which prompted me to look into the license:
Leo is Open Software and is distributed under the terms of the Python License.
It seem Python License is a bit
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:25 AM, jkn jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk wrote:
Just wondering what the general opinion is--is that a stumbling block
for others? For newbies?
I wouldn't put it as strongly as a 'stumbling block', but I too find
the 'heading' term sweeter.
This is too much of a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
It seem Python License is a bit problematic:
Why not just say, distributed under the same license as Python 2.6, namely
the so-called Python 2.4.2 license.
http://www.python.org/psf/license/
I am not a lawyer, but
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I vaguely recall that Python Software
Foundation discouraged the use of Python License / Python Software
Foundation license for external packages.
Also see:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm willing to put in some work into making Leo end up in Debian (and
as a consequence, Ubuntu). It will mean more users (because people
find projects by browsing whats available in package repos), but I
think Leo may
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
I would, in fact, have no objection to making all of Leo public domain
software. In effect, it is that way already. Anyone can do anything with
Leo. Period. I have not done so because RMS and others would claim that
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.comwrote:
I was probably way too boisterous in my edits, trusting the wiki to keep
history and manage dependencies . .
Please do not make such big changes to existing pages as you have done. I'm
going to move your page to an
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.comwrote:
I was probably way too boisterous in my edits, trusting the wiki to keep
history and manage dependencies.
How does one revert a wiki page?
Edward
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
I was probably way too boisterous in my edits, trusting the wiki to keep
history and manage dependencies.
How does one revert a wiki page?
http://leo.zwiki.org/LeoWiki/recentchanges
Click on the time to see the
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was probably way too boisterous in my edits, trusting the wiki to keep
history and manage dependencies.
How does one revert a wiki
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume you are not familiar with what it takes to get into
Debian/Ubuntu distribution. They are extremely picky about licensing,
and unclear licensing is a surefire way to raise complaints (and cause
outright
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. I'll contribute to this vast silliness by changing Leo's license to the
MIT (or should I say X11??) license.
Just MIT license. The template was here:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
--
Ville
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I feel less cranky now.
I spoke too soon. Somehow only 6 recent versions are visible, none what I
want.
It is incredibly annoying to lose work this way. I thought I had saved the
latest to LeoDocs.leo, but
I took a little time to run the QT version of Leo, it is looking
pretty nice. However, some of the stuff I'm working on right now uses
IPython, and there is a QT IPython shell that pops up when I Alt-shift-
I to start an ILeo session.
That shell is pretty non-functional with my current setup,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone can find a way to revert the page properly I would be grateful.
I did the necessary work by hand. It may be exactly what it was before, but
it is close, and in one case is better than before. So,
**Do not
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 4:34 PM, tfer tfethers...@aol.com wrote:
That shell is pretty non-functional with my current setup, it accepts
typed input but does nothing with it. Saw a note on this list that I
Did you enter it on the lower editor pane?
should be useing Ville's branch, but I'm
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
The latest license is at:
http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/frontMatter.html#leo-s-mit-license
All comments welcome.
Edward
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
On Feb 21, 3:47 pm, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
this vast silliness
I feel your pain.
Here is a funny reference on this subject.
Some people might consider it rude, but personally I find it smart,
hilarious and straight to the point.
http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
I noted that leo always does scrolling in setItemForCurrentPosition.
It used to check for 'scroll' variable (judging by comments), but it
was disabled and now it always does scrolling. I tried calling it with
scroll=False in afterSelectHint, and returned the old code (I think)
that actually
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
Please do not make such big changes to existing pages as you have done.
I'm going to move your page to an alternative intro page, and restore my
intro.
No need to keep the alternative, it was an experiment with
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
I did the necessary work by hand. It may be exactly what it was before,
but it is close, and in one case is better than before. So,
**Do not change this page significantly without permission!**
My revision mostly
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.comwrote:
I did the necessary work by hand. It may be exactly what it was before,
but it is close, and in one case is better than before. So,
**Do
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:25 AM, jkn jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk wrote:
Just wondering what the general opinion is--is that a stumbling block
for others? For newbies?
I wouldn't put it as strongly as a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
- License fixed (see my previous post)
I'll do this if need be. But I need much more convincing.
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations) -- or it's a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com
wrote:
- License fixed (see my previous post)
I'll do this if need be. But I need much more convincing.
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations) -- or
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com
wrote:
- License fixed (see my previous post)
I'll do this if need be. But I need much more convincing.
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations) -- or
On Feb 21, 2:26 pm, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.com wrote:
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations)
I am not going to waste time arguing. I agree with none of this.
Leo benefits in no way from the GPL or any other Open
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.comwrote:
Headline tells me that there must be some technical details I have to get
before I really appreciate what it is.
There are :-)
Heading keys into established page layout contexts and lets me just go
ahead with
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:45 AM, zpcspm zpc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 3:47 pm, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
this vast silliness
I feel your pain.
Here is a funny reference on this subject.
Some people might consider it rude, but personally I find it smart,
hilarious and
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Terry Brown terry_n_br...@yahoo.comwrote:
- You need to make a @button:
@button doPath
g.doHook(icondclick1,c=c,p=p,v=p,event=None)
You can use @button or @command. Either way, you can, and probably should,
bind a keystroke to it, say:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
I say 'read' because in vim the command ':r(ead) filename' will
place the content of filename into the current buffer at the cursor
position.
and ':e(dit) filename' creates a new buffer associated with filename
maybe
On Feb 12, 11:38 am, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
How about a act-on-node command?
Great idea. Somehow I missed this more than a week ago.
This would be similar to alt-I (push-to-ipython), in that it would
invoke whatever operation is associated with the node. Currently,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 2:26 pm, Seth Johnson seth.p.john...@gmail.com wrote:
I often tell BSD folks that the GPL is like disciplined organizing (like
cadre-based organizations)
I am not going to waste time arguing. I agree
34 matches
Mail list logo
