On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:17 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
leo-editor@googlegroups.com wrote:
It seems that the uA persisting code really should try and save uA
info on nodes it can't match...
I agree.
I guess it's a question of what the uA data is.
No. It's simply a question of where
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:16:45 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:17 PM, 'Terry Brown' via leo-editor
leo-editor@googlegroups.com wrote:
...it may be best simply to require an exact match, and fall back on
creating nodes to hold uA's in case no match is found.
On 7/16/2014 8:59 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
the simplest thing that could possibly work
Ockham's Razor at work! Good :)
Nice work, Edward. Keep it up!
--Jake
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
leo-editor group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
First impressions:
- the @auto node icons indicate they are clones
- I'm not sure why the @persistence tree is visible, can it
be used for something? Maybe somehow useful in resolving
issues?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jacob Peck gatesph...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/16/2014 8:59 AM, Edward
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
First impressions:
- the @auto node icons indicate they are clones
Only if they are clones :-)
- I'm not sure why the @persistence tree is visible, can it be used for
something? Maybe somehow useful in resolving issues?
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:14:59 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
First impressions:
- the @auto node icons indicate they are clones
Only if they are clones :-)
I do notice that the icon box has a black
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Kent Tenney kten...@gmail.com wrote:
First impressions:
- the @auto node icons indicate they are clones
Only if they are clones :-)
No, all of them, none are clones. Sounds like
In the attempt of resuscitating this thread, I am venturing a very basic
classification scheme for the proposed features to be implemented in v5.0,
based on the level of importance: high-priority features, medium-priority
features, low-priority features.
To start with, what features do you see
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:22:03 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
I do notice that the icon box has a black border, indicating that the
@auto node is dirty. That's a recent problem. I'll fix it asap.
This looks like an interaction problem with the bookmarks.py plugin. Not
exactly sure
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:22:03 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote:
I do notice that the icon box has a black border, indicating that
the
@auto node is dirty. That's a recent problem. I'll fix it
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Edward K. Ream edream...@gmail.com wrote:
I just upped code that starts to support @recovery trees in each per-file
@data tree:
Rev 9a082a8... fixes several problems. All tests pass, including some
by-hand tests of real-world scenarios.
The only remaining
If you see any odd behavior with menus and or focus, please let me
know, hopefully nothing's changed. I've just made three changes with
allow the --minimize command line flag to work again, it's bugged me
for ages that it's broken. One of the changes involved removing a
kludge that was added to
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:38:28 -0500
'Terry Brown' via leo-editor leo-editor@googlegroups.com wrote:
If you see any odd behavior with menus and or focus, please let me
know, hopefully nothing's changed. I've just made three changes with
p.s. bugs with three distinct causes for the same symptom
13 matches
Mail list logo
